MEDIA
RELEASE
University
Communications
View RMIT media
releases and
find experts:
rmit.edu.au/newsroom
MELBOURNE
BRUNSWICK
BUNDOORA
FISHERMANS BEND
POINT COOK
HAMILTON
HO CHI MINH CITY
HANOI
Voluntary carbon market stagnates: report
Sales and investment in the voluntary carbon market have stagnated in the last six
months under the impact of Federal Government policy confusion, according to the
latest update of the Carbon Offset Guide.
Developed by Global Sustainability at RMIT University and EPA Victoria, the
Carbon Offset Guide is the most comprehensive and independent directory of
Australian offset providers, featuring details of prices, project locations,
descriptions and accreditation standards.
Global Sustainability at RMIT Director, Caroline Bayliss, said many of the 91
providers listed in the latest update had reported that sales and investment have
stopped growing.
“Based on our comprehensive surveys and follow-up conversations with offset
providers, it is clear that many are pessimistic about the future of Australian
abatement activity – that is, offsets produced from local projects,” Ms Bayliss said.
“Many sellers of locally-sourced offsets are telling us that there is simply no
business, due to the impact of recent Federal Government policy changes.
“The businesses, governments and households that want to purchase locally-
sourced offsets are also telling us that they are losing confidence in the market.
“The clear consensus among the providers and consumers we deal with is that the
Federal Government must act urgently to fix these problems, or risk the failure of
Australian companies delivering domestic voluntary carbon abatement – and the
loss of jobs, innovative technologies and skills developed by those businesses.”
The Federal Government’s National Carbon Offset Standard (NCOS) – which
came into effect on 1 July – only covers abatement that does not count towards
Australia’s targets under the Kyoto Protocol, such as soil carbon projects.
Ms Bayliss said this left many current Australian offset projects, such as forestry
and energy efficiency, with no framework for certification.
“Providers are confirming that at present they cannot supply any Australian local
offsets that would comply with NCOS,” she said.
“The result is that companies and local governments that have made commitments
to go ‘carbon neutral’ must now purchase offsets from projects overseas.
“Others that have not yet made such commitments, but want to buy local offsets
that make a difference to aggregate global emissions, are reporting that they are
simply opting not to purchase offsets at all.”
7
July, 2010
MEDIA
RELEASE
University
Communications
View RMIT media
releases and
find experts:
rmit.edu.au/newsroom
MELBOURNE
BRUNSWICK
BUNDOORA
FISHERMANS BEND
POINT COOK
HAMILTON
HO CHI MINH CITY
HANOI
Ms Bayliss said NCOS had replaced the Greenhouse Friendly Program, which has
traditionally been the preferred option for certification of Australian abatement
projects
“Many providers have spent considerable effort and expense to achieve
certification of domestic projects and abatement under Greenhouse Friendly and at
present there are no arrangements to recognise this prior certification under
NCOS,” she said.
Offset project developers have expressed a distinct lack of willingness to invest
further resources required to develop new offset projects and methodologies due to
this policy uncertainty, Ms Bayliss said.
“Since there are no established international accreditation methodologies for the
projects envisaged under NCOS, providers are not prepared to spend considerable
time and effort to develop a new methodology which may or may not gain
accreditation under NCOS,” she said.
The policy developments are outlined in the recent updates to the Carbon Offset
Guide.
For interviews: Global Sustainability at RMIT Director, Caroline Bayliss, (03)
9925 3344 or 0408 142 050.
For general media enquiries: RMIT University Communications, Gosia
Kaszubska, (03) 9925 3176 or 0417 510 735.
NEWS 
